On 2007-11-03 15:28:51 +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> This reminds me of someone suggesting that some patches could be
> represented by more than one commit.
You might be remebering me pointing out that the old infrastructure
supported (or at least not directly disallowed) this.
> But I'm not sure such a beast would be useful - I fear that would
> make StGIT much more complicated, but would it really make things
> better?
Yes, it makes everything much more complicated, and no, it doesn't buy
us anything new. After all, once we know the parent and the tree we
want a patch to have, we can just manufacture a commit that has that
tree and that parent.
My proposed new infrastructure cannot represent such patches, very
much by design.
--
Karl Hasselström, kha@xxxxxxxxxxx
www.treskal.com/kalle
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
