Re: [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 07:40:28 -0800
Cc: Jeff Hostetler <jeffhostetler@xxxxxxxxxx>, edecosta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <d5e2cd60-49f7-91bf-0678-70e3671b1cad@jeffhostetler.com> (Jeff Hostetler's message of "Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:23:29 -0500")
References: <xmqqtu0lzzn2.fsf@gitster.g> <d5e2cd60-49f7-91bf-0678-70e3671b1cad@jeffhostetler.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)

Jeff Hostetler <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This is on Linux, so it would be using the linux inotify backend.
> Let me add Eric to the "To:" line for visibility.

Thanks for redirection.

References:
- [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?
  - From: Jeff Hostetler

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rebase: remove completely useless -C option
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/8] clone: set fetch.bundleURI if appropriate
Previous by thread: Re: [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?
Next by thread: Re: [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux