Re: [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 1/19/23 9:52 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
The said test failed its linux-musl job in its first attempt, but
re-running the failed job passed.

     https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/3963948890/jobs/6792356234
     (seen@e096683 attempt #1 linux-musl)

     https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/3963948890/jobs/6792850313
     (seen@e096683 attempt #2 linux-musl)


This is on Linux, so it would be using the linux inotify backend.
Let me add Eric to the "To:" line for visibility.  And see if he
has experienced this during his development of it.

I've not looked at the inotify code so I can't say if there are
races there or not.  Tests that move directories feel like good
candidates for race conditions -- since the daemon doesn't get a
recursive view of the tree with inotify() and must simulate that
and manage the individual directories, but again I don't want to
assume that.

Jeff




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux