[CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:52:01 -0800
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)

The said test failed its linux-musl job in its first attempt, but
re-running the failed job passed.

    https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/3963948890/jobs/6792356234
    (seen@e096683 attempt #1 linux-musl)

    https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/3963948890/jobs/6792850313
    (seen@e096683 attempt #2 linux-musl)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?
  - From: SZEDER Gábor
- Re: [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?
  - From: Jeff Hostetler

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] rebase: mark --update-refs as requiring the merge backend
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3] checkout/switch: disallow checking out same branch in multiple worktrees
Previous by thread: [PATCH v9 0/2] send-email: expose header information to git-send-email's sendemail-validate hook
Next by thread: Re: [CI]: Is t7527 known to be flakey?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux