René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> writes: >> would at least the two included in the chunks above be safe enough for >> RC2 as I hope?, is the one with the additional int too hacky to be >> considered for release?; > > I think your -pedantic fixes 1 and 2 should go into the next possible > release candidate because they fix regressions. I agree. They are at the bottom of 'seen' just above 'master' in last night's pushout for this exact reason. > Same for my signed-left-shift fix in > http://public-inbox.org/git/bab9f889-ee2e-d3c3-0319-e297b59261a0@xxxxxx/ > (or some improved version if it's lacking in some way) and the yet to be > published fix for the alignment issue. I assume Andrzej as the reporter > or Eric as the original author would like to have a shot at the latter. Thanks. It was missed as it was buried in the discussion exchange. Will queue together with cb/many-alternate-optim-fixup topic.
