Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] pedantic errors in next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 12:30 PM René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Those are different issues and they should be addressed by separate patches,
> I think.  That's why I submitted a patch for the second one in
> http://public-inbox.org/git/bab9f889-ee2e-d3c3-0319-e297b59261a0@xxxxxx/.

agree, and that is why I mentioned not to merge mine but use your
whole series instead when it is published (mine was just a stopgap to
see if I could get SANITIZE=undefined to behave meanwhile, but that I
thought would be worth making public so anyone else affected might
have something to start with)

would at least the two included in the chunks above be safe enough for
RC2 as I hope?, is the one with the additional int too hacky to be
considered for release?; FWIW hadn't been able to reproduce that issue
you reported in t3301 even with an Apple M1 with macOS 11.5.1 (I use
NO_GETTEXT=1 though, not sure that might be why)

Anything I can help with?

Carlo




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux