Hi Carlo, Am 11.08.21 um 01:49 schrieb Carlo Arenas: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 12:30 PM René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Those are different issues and they should be addressed by separate patches, >> I think. That's why I submitted a patch for the second one in >> http://public-inbox.org/git/bab9f889-ee2e-d3c3-0319-e297b59261a0@xxxxxx/. > > agree, and that is why I mentioned not to merge mine but use your > whole series instead when it is published (mine was just a stopgap to > see if I could get SANITIZE=undefined to behave meanwhile, but that I > thought would be worth making public so anyone else affected might > have something to start with) > > would at least the two included in the chunks above be safe enough for > RC2 as I hope?, is the one with the additional int too hacky to be > considered for release?; I think your -pedantic fixes 1 and 2 should go into the next possible release candidate because they fix regressions. Same for my signed-left-shift fix in http://public-inbox.org/git/bab9f889-ee2e-d3c3-0319-e297b59261a0@xxxxxx/ (or some improved version if it's lacking in some way) and the yet to be published fix for the alignment issue. I assume Andrzej as the reporter or Eric as the original author would like to have a shot at the latter. > FWIW hadn't been able to reproduce that issue > you reported in t3301 even with an Apple M1 with macOS 11.5.1 (I use > NO_GETTEXT=1 though, not sure that might be why) Strange. I use Apple clang version 12.0.5 (clang-1205.0.22.11) on the same OS. At least the reproduction on Linux that you mentioned in your reply means I can calm down a bit because it's not just a problem on my system.. Thank you, René
