Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] pedantic errors in next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón  <carenas@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Building next with pedantic enabled shows the following 2 issues that
> were originally in ew/many-alternate-optim, apologies for not catching
> them earlier.

This of course affects 'master'.

The first two look trivially correct and I am tempted to take them
in -rc2; the last one, from my cursory look, I didn't see anything
wrong in it, but is not all that urgent, either.

> the second one could be skipped, and has indeed another similar case
> already in seen which will be send separately.

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux