Re: [PATCH 0/2] C99: harder dependency on variadic macros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> If this works on Windows, it will also work on Unix, because POSIX has
> required C99 support since the 2001 revision, and __VA_ARGS__ is C99.
> Unix systems are not the thing preventing us from enabling C99 support
> (or any subset of it) in any meaningful sense.

Yeah, among the list (semi-)regulars, the only ones that may likely
to be broken is the NonStop folks.  Hopefully they are aware of this
discussion?

https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqeeffe669.fsf@gitster.g/




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux