Re: [PATCH 0/2] C99: harder dependency on variadic macros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] C99: harder dependency on variadic macros
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:14:52 +0700
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>, "brian m . carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>, Git Users <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <cover-0.2-00000000000-20210412T105422Z-avarab@gmail.com>
References: <YHOLo36MfuTj6YeD@camp.crustytoothpaste.net> <cover-0.2-00000000000-20210412T105422Z-avarab@gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1

On 12/04/21 18.02, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:

But I'm submitting this because of brian m. carlson's note[3] about
wanting to submit more general patches for declaring a hard dependency
on all of C99.


I think we should bump standard requirement to C99, right?

--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] C99: harder dependency on variadic macros
  - From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason

References:
- Re: [PATCH 09/15] hash: set and copy algo field in struct object_id
  - From: brian m. carlson
- [PATCH 0/2] C99: harder dependency on variadic macros
  - From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason

Prev by Date: [PATCH v2 2/2] svn tests: refactor away a "set -e" in test body
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] git-send-email: die on invalid smtp_encryption
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] git-compat-util.h: clarify comment on GCC-specific code
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] C99: harder dependency on variadic macros
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux