Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I don't care for `--raw` either but couldn't think of anything better > at the time. But perhaps a name such as `--allow-escapes` would be > clearer, or perhaps not. `--c-style-escapes`? It's printf(1) style escapes ;-) > Anyhow, it's pure bikeshedding as I mentioned in my original email, so > not a big deal. I brought it up only because the very first thought > that popped into my head when reading the commit message saying it was > adding `--printf` was "oh, interesting; how do I specify the arguments > to interpolate into the `printf` format string?".
