Re: [PATCH 0/3] t2106 vs. the default branch name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Wed, 18 Nov 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
>
>
> > The four test scripts for which I sent patch series in the past hours to
> > remove the use of the name `master` won't be touched by v3 of this here
> > patch series at all (because it won't be necessary anymore).
>
> Ah, OK.  I somehow had an impression that the big series was more or
> less done

Me, too. And if I had listened to certain people who claim that lazy
programmers are the best programmers, I would have stopped there, too.

> but rethinking the structure and ejecting these changes to tests that do
> not care what name the "init" uses by default from the series makes a
> lot of sense.

Yep.

Ciao,
Dscho




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux