Re: [PATCH 0/3] t2106 vs. the default branch name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:


> The four test scripts for which I sent patch series in the past hours to
> remove the use of the name `master` won't be touched by v3 of this here
> patch series at all (because it won't be necessary anymore).

Ah, OK.  I somehow had an impression that the big series was more or
less done but rethinking the structure and ejecting these changes to
tests that do not care what name the "init" uses by default from the
series makes a lot of sense.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux