Hi Junio, On Wed, 18 Nov 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> > writes: > > > Yet another thing I noticed while working on > > https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/762. > > > > Johannes Schindelin (3): > > t2106: adjust style to the current conventions > > t2106: make test independent of the current main branch name > > t2106: ensure that the checkout fails for the expected reason > > > > t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh | 31 +++++++++++++----------- > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > This seems to partly replicate and partly deprecate what is in that > final stretch 27-or-28 patch series does to the same test script. > Are we taking this and then removing a patch or two from that larger > series? Sorry, I meant to explain my current thinking: for v3, I want to accommodate your wish (to mark every test script with the hard-coded default branch name individually, and only those test scripts that actually need to hard-code it). It is not only to fulfill your wish, I got genuinely curious what would actually be needed to make that happen. The four test scripts for which I sent patch series in the past hours to remove the use of the name `master` won't be touched by v3 of this here patch series at all (because it won't be necessary anymore). Ciao, Dscho
