Re: [PATCH 0/3] t2106 vs. the default branch name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx>
writes:

> Yet another thing I noticed while working on 
> https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/762.
>
> Johannes Schindelin (3):
>   t2106: adjust style to the current conventions
>   t2106: make test independent of the current main branch name
>   t2106: ensure that the checkout fails for the expected reason
>
>  t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh | 31 +++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

This seems to partly replicate and partly deprecate what is in that
final stretch 27-or-28 patch series does to the same test script.
Are we taking this and then removing a patch or two from that larger
series?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux