On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:01:54AM +0200, demerphq wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 09:43, Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 09:36:59AM +0200, demerphq wrote: > > > On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 20:24, Sérgio Augusto Vianna > > > <sergio.a.vianna@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Ok, can you show me a single instance where "master" was confusing or > > > > not descriptive enough? > > > > > > A: "No you need to fetch master from the remote, then you need to > > > merge it to your local master and then push it to the master master". > > > B: "remote master, local master and master master. wtf kind of master is that?" > > Which falls on the wording of the FAQ, not the terminology itself. If > > you were confused I am sure there are ways to bring this up and even > > submit changes. > > I think you missed my point entirely. Sergio asked how "master" might No you did. What I am trying to say is you did not your job well when the FAQ for git or your project has the answer "...and then push it to the master master". Thanks Michal
