On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 09:36:59AM +0200, demerphq wrote: > On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 20:24, Sérgio Augusto Vianna > <sergio.a.vianna@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Ok, can you show me a single instance where "master" was confusing or > > not descriptive enough? > > A: "No you need to fetch master from the remote, then you need to > merge it to your local master and then push it to the master master". > B: "remote master, local master and master master. wtf kind of master is that?" Which falls on the wording of the FAQ, not the terminology itself. If you were confused I am sure there are ways to bring this up and even submit changes. Thanks Michal