Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)
- From: Sérgio Augusto Vianna <sergio.a.vianna@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 15:23:29 -0300
- Cc: Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx, don@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, msuchanek@xxxxxxx, newren@xxxxxxxxx, philipoakley@iee.email, sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sergio.a.vianna@xxxxxxxxx, simon@xxxxxxxxxx, stolee@xxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20200614181906.u42tuny3eipvhd46@chatter.i7.local>
- References: <20200614181906.u42tuny3eipvhd46@chatter.i7.local>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0
Ok, can you show me a single instance where "master" was confusing or
not descriptive enough? Mind you, this all comes at the expense of a lot
of friction in the LITERAL WHOLE WORLD. Bugs, stuff breaking,
incompatibility issues, you name it. And let's not forget that people
already have all the tools they need to NOT have a master branch if they
don't want to. I think half dozen people can spare a few seconds instead
of wasting literally everybody else's time fixing their respective
software. Also, literally no one cared until americans went hysterical
with the death of that guy in Minneapolis. It only shows it has never
been an issue and is not an issue now. This is just 8% of americans
trying to virtue signal at the expense of literally everyone else.
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel Development]
[Gcc Help]
[IETF Annouce]
[DCCP]
[Netdev]
[Networking]
[Security]
[V4L]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Fedora Users]