On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:51 PM Alexandru Pătrănescu <drealecs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sérgio > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:37 PM Sérgio Augusto Vianna > <sergio.a.vianna@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > >But the people that contribute to the code and to an open-source > > project are the owner of that project so they get to get the calls. > > > > Ignoring everyone else's opinions and needs and just exerting your > > authority is the very definition of authoritarianism. Yes, they do have > > the right. But if they ignore the users, they can just use a fork that > > does what they want. Have anyone considered that a breaking change in > > git might very well result in a fork? > Well... fork happens sometimes when two groups of people completely > disagree and cannot work together. > I really hope a vote here would be enough to settle things. > > Sérgio, I'm actually with you on this side, just to state my opinion as well. > > I haven't yet heard of a person that is offended by git master branch. > I've heard thou about persons that think that some others will get offended. > But most of the time, I've heard about people that think this world > got crazy on git master branch naming :). > > But I guess you've heard that already from other participants already, > so I apologize for repeating it. > > And I believe that both of you, Sérgio and Jonathan, were a bit rude > to each other :) Calling out violations of the code of conduct certainly takes some directness, but merely calling out the behavioral violations is not in and of itself rude. Sérgio's behavior I think is exactly the type of reason we adopted the code of conduct; insulting others is not wanted and is not welcome on this list. The harder part of having a code of conduct is trying to coax people to follow it. Several folks tried nicer responses to Sérgio earlier in the thread, but to no avail. >From my view, a more direct response was clearer needed. I'm grateful Jonathan jumped in to do so; I thought he did an exemplary job. Elijah
