Sérgio On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:37 PM Sérgio Augusto Vianna <sergio.a.vianna@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >But the people that contribute to the code and to an open-source > project are the owner of that project so they get to get the calls. > > Ignoring everyone else's opinions and needs and just exerting your > authority is the very definition of authoritarianism. Yes, they do have > the right. But if they ignore the users, they can just use a fork that > does what they want. Have anyone considered that a breaking change in > git might very well result in a fork? Well... fork happens sometimes when two groups of people completely disagree and cannot work together. I really hope a vote here would be enough to settle things. Sérgio, I'm actually with you on this side, just to state my opinion as well. I haven't yet heard of a person that is offended by git master branch. I've heard thou about persons that think that some others will get offended. But most of the time, I've heard about people that think this world got crazy on git master branch naming :). But I guess you've heard that already from other participants already, so I apologize for repeating it. And I believe that both of you, Sérgio and Jonathan, were a bit rude to each other :) Let's relax and have a drink! Cheers! Alex
