Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)
- From: Sérgio Augusto Vianna <sergio.a.vianna@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:18:05 -0300
- Cc: Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx, don@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, msuchanek@xxxxxxx, newren@xxxxxxxxx, philipoakley@iee.email, sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sergio.a.vianna@xxxxxxxxx, simon@xxxxxxxxxx, stolee@xxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20200615180744.GB135968@google.com>
- References: <20200615180744.GB135968@google.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0
Yes, half dozen people who are scared to be cancelled agreed with it.
Tell me what, why don't we run a poll on popular places about tech and
see what people think of it? It's pretty authoritarian to force the
whole world to be affected by a change that only very few want. There's
barely a dozen people in this conversation for a tool that is pretty
much a global standard.
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel Development]
[Gcc Help]
[IETF Annouce]
[DCCP]
[Netdev]
[Networking]
[Security]
[V4L]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Fedora Users]