Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)
- From: Sérgio Augusto Vianna <sergio.a.vianna@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:37:30 -0300
- Cc: jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx, johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx, don@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, msuchanek@xxxxxxx, newren@xxxxxxxxx, philipoakley@iee.email, sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, simon@xxxxxxxxxx, stolee@xxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CAAwdEzDgJuoQJAZsrT0piuZPVP6nJTSB9RCbcuXO03-BYTnmOQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20200615180744.GB135968@google.com> <3cef6084-e632-c9ce-c0da-a2c250c2f512@gmail.com> <CAAwdEzDgJuoQJAZsrT0piuZPVP6nJTSB9RCbcuXO03-BYTnmOQ@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0
>But the people that contribute to the code and to an open-source
project are the owner of that project so they get to get the calls.
Ignoring everyone else's opinions and needs and just exerting your
authority is the very definition of authoritarianism. Yes, they do have
the right. But if they ignore the users, they can just use a fork that
does what they want. Have anyone considered that a breaking change in
git might very well result in a fork?
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel Development]
[Gcc Help]
[IETF Annouce]
[DCCP]
[Netdev]
[Networking]
[Security]
[V4L]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Fedora Users]