Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> +generate_references () {
> + for i
Is it just me who thinks variables used in iteration should be
called i, j, etc. only when they are integers?
> + do
> + oid=$(git rev-parse "$i") || return 1
> + printf '%s\t%s\n' "$oid" "$i"
> + done
> +}
> +
> test_expect_success setup '
> >file &&
> git add file &&
> @@ -43,34 +51,19 @@ test_expect_success 'ls-remote self' '
> '
>
> test_expect_success 'ls-remote --sort="version:refname" --tags self' '
> - cat >expect <<-EOF &&
> - $(git rev-parse mark) refs/tags/mark
> - $(git rev-parse mark1.1) refs/tags/mark1.1
> - $(git rev-parse mark1.2) refs/tags/mark1.2
> - $(git rev-parse mark1.10) refs/tags/mark1.10
> - EOF
> + generate_references refs/tags/mark refs/tags/mark1.1 refs/tags/mark1.2 refs/tags/mark1.10 >expect &&
Hmph, can we avoid overlong lines like this one?
generate_references >expect <<-EOF
refs/tags/mark
refs/tags/mark1.1
refs/tags/mark1.2
refs/tags/mark1.10
EOF
i.e. teaching the helper function to read from its standard input
stream, may make it more readable (i.e. it is more obvious what the
order of expected output lines are, as you are listing them one by
one on a line of its own).
