Re: [PATCH v14 2/4] ref-filter: make ref_array_item allocation more consistent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Harald Nordgren
>> <haraldnordgren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> There have been no new comments for the last few days. I know Jeff
>>> King will be away for the next two weeks, but should we still move
>>> forward with this? The initial reactions to the idea seemed positive.
>> ...
>> It will be merged to next and if no people speak up (due to bugs
>> observed or such)
>
> I would guess, however, that Harald is wondering more specifically
> about the "--sort" patch he added atop Peff's patches. Disposition for
> _that_ patch is not specified in the latest "What's cooking":
>
>     * hn/sort-ls-remote (2018-04-09) 1 commit
>      - ls-remote: create '--sort' option
>      (this branch uses jk/ref-array-push.)
>
>      "git ls-remote" learned an option to allow sorting its output based
>      on the refnames being shown.

Thanks all for summarizing.

I think the preliminary clean-up patches by Peff are all
independently good and can be advanced, even without him being
around.  I haven't formed a firm opinion on the doneness of the
latest round of the "--sort" thing.  I usually do not explicitly
write "I haven't formed an opinion" in "What's cooking" report,
so please read the lack of "disposition" as such.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux