On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Harald Nordgren
> <haraldnordgren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> There have been no new comments for the last few days. I know Jeff
>> King will be away for the next two weeks, but should we still move
>> forward with this? The initial reactions to the idea seemed positive.
>
> Please see the "What's cooking?" email on the mailing list that is
> sent out periodically by Junio.
>
>> * jk/ref-array-push (2018-04-09) 3 commits
>> - ref-filter: factor ref_array pushing into its own function
>> - ref-filter: make ref_array_item allocation more consistent
>> - ref-filter: use "struct object_id" consistently
>> (this branch is used by hn/sort-ls-remote.)
>>
>> API clean-up aournd ref-filter code.
>>
>> Will merge to 'next'.
>
> It will be merged to next and if no people speak up (due to bugs
> observed or such)
I would guess, however, that Harald is wondering more specifically
about the "--sort" patch he added atop Peff's patches. Disposition for
_that_ patch is not specified in the latest "What's cooking":
* hn/sort-ls-remote (2018-04-09) 1 commit
- ls-remote: create '--sort' option
(this branch uses jk/ref-array-push.)
"git ls-remote" learned an option to allow sorting its output based
on the refnames being shown.
