Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > How about we do a slightly different > arrangement for these overflow commits? > > Instead of storing the commits in the commit-graph file as "0" (which > currently means "written by a version of git that did not compute > generation numbers") we could let GENERATION_NUMBER_MAX be the maximum > generation of a commit in the commit-graph, and if a commit would have > larger generation, we collapse it down to that value. Sure. Any value we can tell that it is special is fine. Thanks.