[PATCH 0/7] l10n: de.po: use imperative form for command options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Some people have suggested to use an imperative form for translating
command options. I added this topic to my TODO list and now found
the time to implement it.

I've splitted this huge patch into seven parts to make the review
easier. I'll squash those 7 parts into one big patch before applying.

Ralf Thielow (7):
  part1: l10n: de.po: use imperative form for command options
  part2: l10n: de.po: use imperative form for command options
  part3: l10n: de.po: use imperative form for command options
  part4: l10n: de.po: use imperative form for command options
  part5: l10n: de.po: use imperative form for command options
  part6: l10n: de.po: use imperative form for command options
  part7: l10n: de.po: use imperative form for command options

 po/de.po | 1146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 1 file changed, 573 insertions(+), 573 deletions(-)

-- 
2.1.0.368.g9f4fb5d

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]