On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 6/9/2013 22:31, schrieb Junio C Hamano: >> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> I'm a little negative on handling just SIGTERM. That would make the test >>> pass, but does it really address the overall issue? To me, the >>> usefulness is having exit values with consistent meanings. >> >> Yes. Unless the goal is to give Windows port pratically the same >> signal semantics as ports on other platforms, I do not think special >> casing SIGTERM (unless it is a very common signal on Windows and >> others are unlikely to be useful) buys us much. > > I'm thinking the same. And, no, SIGTERM is not very common on Windows. > I have no strong feelings on SIGTERM, but my knee-jerk reaction is the same. AFAIK, the only issue we've seen with it has been this one, which is synthetic. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html