[PATCH] t0005: skip signal death exit code test on Windows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx>

The test case depends on that test-sigchain can commit suicide by a call
to raise(SIGTERM) in a way that run-command.c::wait_or_whine() can detect
as death through a signal. There are no POSIX signals on Windows, and a
sufficiently close emulation is not available in the Microsoft C runtime
(and probably not even possible).

The particular deficiency is that when a signal is raise()d whose SIG_DFL
action will cause process death (SIGTERM in this case), the
implementation of raise() just calls exit(3).

We could check for exit code 3 in addition to 143, but that would miss
the point of the test entirely. Hence, just skip it on Windows.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx>
---
 t/t0005-signals.sh | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/t/t0005-signals.sh b/t/t0005-signals.sh
index ad9e604..981437b 100755
--- a/t/t0005-signals.sh
+++ b/t/t0005-signals.sh
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ test_expect_success 'sigchain works' '
 	test_cmp expect actual
 '
 
-test_expect_success 'signals are propagated using shell convention' '
+test_expect_success !MINGW 'signals are propagated using shell convention' '
 	# we use exec here to avoid any sub-shell interpretation
 	# of the exit code
 	git config alias.sigterm "!exec test-sigchain" &&
-- 
1.8.3.1489.g15123b5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]