Re: [PATCH] mingw: make mingw_signal return the correct handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Returning the SIGALRM handler for SIGINT is not very useful.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Am 6/7/2013 16:20, schrieb Erik Faye-Lund:
>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> BTW, isn't mingw_signal() bogus in that it returns the SIGALRM handler
>>> even if a SIGINT handler is installed?
>>
>> Yep, that's a bug. Thanks for noticing.
>
> This is your patch to address it.
>
>> I've pushed out a branch here that tries to address these issues, but
>> I haven't had time to test them. I'll post the series when I have. In
>> the mean time:
>>
>> https://github.com/kusma/git/tree/win32-signal-raise
>
> Concerning the other two patches:
>
> * SIGINT: perhaps handle only the SIG_DFL case (for the exit code) and
> forward all other cases to MSVCRT?

Perhaps. I'll have to think a bit about it, but it might very well be
the sanest approach, as long as it doesn't break git_terminal_prompt
(which was the reason for the change in the first place). I can't of
the top of my head understand why it should, though.

> * SIGTERM: it papers only over a general issue and should be dropped.

Fair enough.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]