Am 6/9/2013 22:31, schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> I'm a little negative on handling just SIGTERM. That would make the test >> pass, but does it really address the overall issue? To me, the >> usefulness is having exit values with consistent meanings. > > Yes. Unless the goal is to give Windows port pratically the same > signal semantics as ports on other platforms, I do not think special > casing SIGTERM (unless it is a very common signal on Windows and > others are unlikely to be useful) buys us much. I'm thinking the same. And, no, SIGTERM is not very common on Windows. -- Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html