Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> How about this?
>>
>> A patch on top could change the default "git-shell-commands is not
>> present" message if that seems worthwhile.
>
> Hmph.
>
> I wonder if rewording the message when git-shell-commmands directory
> is not there may be a better first step (which actually could be the
> last step)?
Maybe, but it's not a step that I'm interested in. I don't think it
changes the desirability of the patch I sent. They are independent.
[...]
> --- a/shell.c
> +++ b/shell.c
> @@ -162,9 +162,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> /* Allow the user to run an interactive shell */
> cd_to_homedir();
> if (access(COMMAND_DIR, R_OK | X_OK) == -1) {
> - die("Interactive git shell is not enabled.\n"
> + die("The user has been recognized as '%s' but "
> + "interactive git shell is not enabled.\n"
> "hint: ~/" COMMAND_DIR " should exist "
> - "and have read and execute access.");
> + "and have read and execute access.",
> + get_user_name());
Personally I don't think the hint should be here at all (it should be
obvious that git-shell(1) is the place to read about the login
behavior of an account with shell set to git-shell), but I don't mind
as long as it's possible to override the message.
Thanks,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html