Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> How about this?
>
> A patch on top could change the default "git-shell-commands is not
> present" message if that seems worthwhile.
Hmph.
I wonder if rewording the message when git-shell-commmands directory
is not there may be a better first step (which actually could be the
last step)?
That is, showing something like this,
> +printf '%s\n' "Hi $USER! You've successfully authenticated, but I do not"
> +printf '%s\n' "provide interactive shell access."
but rephrased with a reference to "git help shell" for people
preparing their own server when ~/git-shell-commands/ in good order?
Something like
diff --git a/shell.c b/shell.c
index 84b237f..71ff04f 100644
--- a/shell.c
+++ b/shell.c
@@ -162,9 +162,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
/* Allow the user to run an interactive shell */
cd_to_homedir();
if (access(COMMAND_DIR, R_OK | X_OK) == -1) {
- die("Interactive git shell is not enabled.\n"
+ die("The user has been recognized as '%s' but "
+ "interactive git shell is not enabled.\n"
"hint: ~/" COMMAND_DIR " should exist "
- "and have read and execute access.");
+ "and have read and execute access.",
+ get_user_name());
}
run_shell();
exit(0);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html