Re: [RFC/PATCH] shell: allow 'help' command to disable interactive shell

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> How about this?
>>>
>>> A patch on top could change the default "git-shell-commands is not
>>> present" message if that seems worthwhile.
>>
>> Hmph.
>>
>> I wonder if rewording the message when git-shell-commmands directory
>> is not there may be a better first step (which actually could be the
>> last step)?
>
> Maybe, but it's not a step that I'm interested in.  I don't think it
> changes the desirability of the patch I sent.  They are independent.

What I thought I read in the log message was that you wanted to give
a better message telling the users that the site does _not_ allow an
interactive shell access.  I do not see how that is independent from
a message given from this codepath, where the side has forbidden
shell access by not having ~/git-shell-commands directory in the
first place.  Are you shooting for customizability?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]