Re: [PATCH 1/2] am: preliminary support for hg patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> ... This is
> correctly detected by -3, with
>
> Applying: Threeway test
> fatal: sha1 information is lacking or useless (dir.h).
> Repository lacks necessary blobs to fall back on 3-way merge.
> Cannot fall back to three-way merge.
> Patch failed at 0001 Threeway test
>
> The message is a bit misleading (it's not the repo lacking the blobs,
> it's the patch missing the information), but the process fails as
> expected.
>
>> What about renaming patches?
>
> They lack similarity indices, but they seem to be properly formated
> (and the simple cases I tested apply correctly).

These were exactly what I wanted to know. Thanks for experimenting.

> So I think that keeping the --git is the right choice.

Yeah, sounds like we are safe and better off keeping it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]