Re: [PATCH 1/2] am: preliminary support for hg patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Nope, it doesn't have index .... lines. Still, the patches seems to
> apply correctly. Well, the couple of patches I tested did, at least,
> even though they were marked as diff --git and they were lacking the
> index ... lines.

Does "am -3" do the right thing when the patch does not apply cleanly, for
example? What about renaming patches?

Until we are reasonably sure that we can grok it reasonably well, I'd
sleep better if we stripped " --git" part from a patch that is known to be
produced by somebody that does not fully re-implement "git diff".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]