On 08/29/2011 06:32 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 13:55 -0700, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > >> But this patch is for all the people and distributions that are going >> to use the old git versions for a while, (Years). >> >> It is important for the Linux mailing-list review, because you get >> patches with: >> >> @@@ lable out: >> - change foo >> + to bazz >> >> And how the hell are you suppose to know where in the file it is. >> This is such a trivial addition, that can help unify everyone's >> usage. I don't see the down sides. > > Ah, I'm using: > > # cat ~/.gitconfig > [diff "default"] > xfuncname = "^[[:alpha:]$_].*[^:]$" > > > For this. It looks like a lost cause so I'll try for the last time. Everyone is suggesting that each one do his own cooked up secrets and solutions. And those that are stupid and know nothing like me are un-lucky. But what I'm proposing is that by just doing a "git clone" you'll be using these settings that we like to see, when you send us your patches. Adding a .gitattributes file to the Linux git tree is a very simple message. "In the linux git tree all .c and .h files are c-source files" (And git will treat them that way) Now that was not so hard was it? Really, no one said anything bad or negative about the patch, only excuses how it can be achieved, very difficultly, in another way. So for the last time: What are you guys afraid of? what possibly could be bad about this patch? Sigh Good bye to this subject Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html