Re: [PATCH] remove ARM and Mozilla SHA1 implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Nicolas Pitre<nico@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> TRy a build with PPC_SHA1=1, and then compare with BLK_SHA1=1.
> And best is to time a fsck --full.

I happen to have an old POWER3 AIX box available.

I got tired of waiting for a fsck --full to complete on the git repo,
so I used git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/xcb/libxcb instead. Best
of five runs:

OpenSSL:
$ time ../git-1.6.4.1/git fsck --full

real    0m4.120s
user    0m3.776s
sys     0m0.031s

BLK_SHA1:
$ time ../git-blk/git fsck --full

real    0m4.231s
user    0m3.867s
sys     0m0.026s

PPC_SHA1:

    CC ppc/sha1ppc.o
Assembler:
/tmp//ccdODWpe.s: line 8: 1252-142 Syntax error.
/tmp//ccdODWpe.s: line 9: 1252-142 Syntax error.
[same error repeated 42 times]
gmake: *** [ppc/sha1ppc.o] Error 1

Hmm. So that may not help so much after all. Let me know if there are
any other tests you would like me to run.

This machine has:
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.2

$ as -v
as V5.3

$ lsattr -E -l proc0
frequency   200000000      Processor Speed       False
smt_enabled false          Processor SMT enabled False
smt_threads 0              Processor SMT threads False
state       enable         Processor state       False
type        PowerPC_POWER3 Processor type        False


Peter Harris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]