On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > > > > > > They are both slower than the new BLK_SHA1 implementation, so it is > > > > > pointless to keep them around. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> --- > > > > > > > > > > Someone else would need to make the call for the PPC version. > > > > > > > > If I don't forget, I can test tomorrow on 2 different 32-bit PPCs and > > > > possibly one 64-bit PPC. > > > > > > Did you forget? ;-) > > > > Yes. > > At long last (XTools took a real long time to install here; it is an old > PowerPC running MacOSX): > > Best of 10 "git rev-list --all" runs on a full Git repository (including > my own tree): > > before 30ae47b4 > > 1.85 real, 1.52 user, 0.28 sys > > after 30ae47b4 > > 1.86 real, 1.52 user, 0.28 sys > > To be frank, the 1.85 looks like an outlier, so I think there is exactly 0 > difference between the two. Maybe there wasn't any _code_ difference after all. According to the Makefile, only mingw defines NO_OPENSSL (although there might certainly be others). TRy a build with PPC_SHA1=1, and then compare with BLK_SHA1=1. And best is to time a fsck --full. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html