Re: [PATCH] remove ARM and Mozilla SHA1 implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Nicolas Pitre wrote:

> They are both slower than the new BLK_SHA1 implementation, so it is
> pointless to keep them around.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Someone else would need to make the call for the PPC version.

If I don't forget, I can test tomorrow on 2 different 32-bit PPCs and 
possibly one 64-bit PPC.

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]