Re: [PATCH] block-sha1: Windows declares ntohl() in winsock2.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Brandon Casey wrote:

> The SUNWspro compiler doesn't set __i386__.  Instead it sets __i386, and
> I think __x86_64 and __amd64 where appropriate.  So, compilation with
> the SUNWspro compiler on x86 is currently unaffected by these changes and
> falls back to the generic routines.
> 
> It seems that v5.10 of the compiler can grok both the __asm__ statements
> and the ({...}) naked block notation and passes all of the tests when the
> block_sha1 code is modified to add defined(__i386) to each of the macro
> statements.

Does it really implement the gcc inline assembly syntax?


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]