Re: [PATCH] block-sha1: Windows declares ntohl() in winsock2.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 14:56, Artur Skawina<art.08.09@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > ...
> >> I'd limit it to windows and any other ia32 platform that doesn't pick the
> >> bswaps itself; as is, it just adds an unnecessary hidden gcc dependency.
> >>
> >> Hmm, it's actually a gcc-4.3+ dependency, so it won't even build w/ gcc 4.2;
> >> something like this would be required: "(__GNUC__>=4 && __GNUC_MINOR__>=3)" .
> >
> > So, as you say the code makes no difference under Linux, would you be
> > OK with just testing for GCC 4.3+, and not for Windows? That would get
> > rid of the "hidden" GCC dependency and not make the preprocessor
> > checks overly complex. Moreover, limiting my patch to any "platform
> > that doesn't pick the bswaps itself" could possibly require
> > maintenance on compiler / CRT updates.
> 
> I would say that should be fine, but I'd let Linus and Nico to overrule me
> on this if they have any input.

Well...  Given that git already uses ntohl/htonl quite extensively in 
its core already, I'd suggest making this more globally available 
instead.


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]