Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Brandon Casey wrote:
>
>> The SUNWspro compiler doesn't set __i386__. Instead it sets __i386, and
>> I think __x86_64 and __amd64 where appropriate. So, compilation with
>> the SUNWspro compiler on x86 is currently unaffected by these changes and
>> falls back to the generic routines.
>>
>> It seems that v5.10 of the compiler can grok both the __asm__ statements
>> and the ({...}) naked block notation and passes all of the tests when the
>> block_sha1 code is modified to add defined(__i386) to each of the macro
>> statements.
>
> Does it really implement the gcc inline assembly syntax?
Yes, I think it does. I actually extracted the assembly from sha1.c and tested
in a separate test program. The v5.10 sunwspro compiler compiles and executes
it correctly.
-brandon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html