Re: GIMP Developer Meeting #3 - March 28, 2011

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Martin Nordholts (enselic@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> 2011/3/27 Michael Natterer <mitch@xxxxxxxx>:
> > And this is *exactly* the problem. We would end up with programmers
> > that quickly learnt vala, having no clue about GObject. That's
> > absolutely horrible.
> 
> How is it a problem that our code becomes so easy that even "dumb"
> programmers can understand and improve it when we are not forced to
> include patches from such "dumb" programmers?

They're bound to hit problems that out of their scope, leaving them
perplexed.

My experience with vala is deeply tainted by the (now resolved) bug
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587683

Bye,
        Simon

PS: I don't like how you rephrase mitch's argument with offending words.

-- 
              simon@xxxxxxxx              http://simon.budig.de/
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux