Hi Martin,
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 01:58:20PM +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> On 08/02/2009 01:50 PM, Roman Joost wrote:
> >> does not change the fact that it would be nice to have a
> >> 'property-changed' signal as a convenience if you have the need to
> >> listen property changes
> > So ... I'm just wondering. If I like to use two signals for the
> > XMPModel, does it still make sense to inherit from GtkTreeStore? I mean,
> > I can't currently see any benefits if I inherit from GtkTreeStore.
>
> In general, aggregation is preferable to inheritance because the former
> results in more dynamic code with less assumptions. If you think
> aggregation makes more sense than inheritance in this case, then I'd say
> go ahead and use aggregation, i.e. have a GtkTreeStore as an instance
> member in XMPModel
Should I redo the patch posted for the bug I've created at:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=589474
and implement the schema change signal (which is missing), or can
someone review the patch again?
Cheers,
--
Roman Joost
www: http://www.romanofski.de
email: romanofski@xxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
