On 07/28/2009 12:40 PM, Roman Joost wrote: > Hi, > > I wasn't sure if I should bring up this discussion on the mailing list > or better on the bug report > (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=589474). > > I think it could be useful to subscribe to events emited by the XMPModel > (although other people know something I don't know). The old XMPModel > used a treestore to store property and schema data. My current work > version inherits from GtkTreeStore. > > There are two things which happen to the treemodel: a property or a > schema could be set. If I'm subscribing to the row-changed event only, I > have to figure out in my callback what has changed: a property or a > schema. By using two different signals, it would be more explicit what > was changed. > > I'm working on another patch, which uses custom entry fields which > "monitor" one property in the XMPModel. Currently they're subscribed to > the 'row-changed' event in the XMPModel, which makes it hard to figure > out if the change belongs to the Entry or not. If I could subscribe to a > 'property-changed' event, I still have to figure out which property has > changed, but don't have to figure out *if a property* has been changed. > That would make life easier. Just to get a discussion going: Coulnd't you implement your own "property-changed" and "schema-changed" in XMPModel? I.e. you would have to write some wrappers on top of "row-changed" that provides nicer callbacks than "row-changed". / Martin _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
