On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:03:31 +0200 Martin Nordholts <enselic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I get your drift, but is it really reasonable to force a user to scale a > say 250px brush to 3px if that is what he desires? It might be, but I > don't think it is with our current scaling mechanism. What do you think > bout offering a range of brushes that together covers a big radius > spectrum? Since scaling currently can be done in the range 10%-1000%, > how about these radiuses for the Circle and Fuzzy Circle ones: > > 10px, 50px, 250px As a user who is constantly scaling up the largest fuzzy circle brush, I'd love to see a different interface... but not in the form of more burshes. How about, as Alexia suggested, a single brush and a size box, which could be a combo box offering the "standard" sizes, plus the option to enter a custom size. Expressing this size in pixels would make them a little less abstract than they currently are, which would make it easier to work with. -- Jon Senior <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
