yahvuu wrote: > This becomes clear in comparison with a database-driven, version-controlled approach > as e.g. sketched in the last mockup of [1]. A Save command is superfluous in this > scenario. When an image gets edited, it's reasonable to assume the user wants to keep > the changes. Otherwise she can undo, revert (= bulk undo) or simply delete the image. > While this and the rest of your mail is true and I agree, one could argue that users of a high-end app still want to be in complete control of when an image composition is written to disk for whatever reason. Or perhaps I'm just too backwards... :) / Martin _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer