On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:24:10 +0100, Mukund <muks@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
gg@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Ahh, I did not see what your previous comment meant. Caught out by this
damn ML reply-to setting again.
I'm subscribed to several lists which operate in a more logical way: I
get a msg from the list , I hit "reply" in my email client and it
replies to the list.
Since the msg came from the ml not from your address the reply-to header
is counter intuitive.
It actually isn't. You may want to read this:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Kind regards,
Mukund
It isn't what? Counter intuitive, it is. I get an email for the list not
from the individual, when I hit reply it replies to the individual I need
to reply to the sender, ie the list.
There may be arguements for and an against but pls let's not start
swamping gimp-devel with that.
I was simply offering my appologies for the confusion and explaining why.
gg.
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
