On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:26:14 +0100, Sven Neumann <sven@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 19:22 +0100, gg@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
when you said your list of stoppers was open for discussion I though you
meant is was open for discussion.
Open for discussion on the mailing list, yes. But if you send your mail
to me alone (which is what the mail header indicated you did), then we
can't have a discussion and the issue is likely going to be forgotten.
Sven
Ahh, I did not see what your previous comment meant. Caught out by this
damn ML reply-to setting again.
I'm subscribed to several lists which operate in a more logical way: I get
a msg from the list , I hit "reply" in my email client and it replies to
the list.
Since the msg came from the ml not from your address the reply-to header
is counter intuitive.
Return-Path: <sven@xxxxxxxx>
From: Sven Neumann <sven@xxxxxxxx>
Plus I have to remember the reply policy is opposite to other MLs I use.
I get it right most of the time. Appologies for the occasional lapse of
concentration.
regards, gg.
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
